Australia, enjoys…
in·ter·reg·num
   [in-ter-reg-nuhm]  –noun, plural -nums, -na  [-nuh] 

Australia, enjoys…

in·ter·reg·num

  [in-ter-reg-nuhm –noun, plural -nums, -na [-nuh] 

26 August 2010

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

The piercing chant from the post below.

25 August 2010

Sunny in the Domain. But next door...

Sunny in the Domain. But next door...

A small but vocal group of protestors...

A small but vocal group of protestors...

...were handing these out.

...were handing these out.

As I walked to lunch it up in the Domain, Vietnamese Government officials were visiting NSW Government House. A small but loud protest group had set themselves opposite, crying out against the ‘communist dictators’ on the street.

I chatted briefly with an older, smiling Vietnamese gent on the street who handed out fliers. “Very bad. Very bad government, yes”, he kept repeating. He seemed friendly, sincere.

 I admit, I’m fairly oblivious to the situation in Vietnam, so I checked out their website. There seems to be a fair bit going on I’m ignorant about. 


25 August 2010

The post-election “line” is that the leaks are what hurt Labor. The line is the problem, not the solution. Even in near-defeat, the spin continues…. they mistake a line for actual communication. A line is non-communication, political white noise aimed at media management, not at communicating with voters, much less taking note of what they might say in response.

~ Bernard Keane in yesterday’s Crikey newsletter 

24 August 2010

Taiwanese animated film about the Aus election. Utterly wonderful. #ausvotes

23 August 2010

 
Australia, welcome to…
in·ter·reg·num
   [in-ter-reg-nuhm]  –noun, plural -nums, -na  [-nuh] 

 1. An interval of time between the close of a sovereign’s reign 
and the accession of his or her normal or legitimate successor.
2. Any period during which a state has no ruler or only atemporary executive.
3. Any period of freedom from the usual authority.
4. Any pause or interruption in continuity.

Australia, welcome to…

in·ter·reg·num

  [in-ter-reg-nuhm]  –noun, plural -nums, -na [-nuh] 


 1. An interval of time between the close of a sovereign’s reign 

and the accession of his or her normal or legitimate successor.

2. Any period during which a state has no ruler or only atemporary executive.

3. Any period of freedom from the usual authority.

4. Any pause or interruption in continuity.

23 August 2010

This is impossible not to dig.
retrogasm:

Louis Armstrong playing for the Sphinx…

This is impossible not to dig.

retrogasm:

Louis Armstrong playing for the Sphinx…

17 August 2010

Fair cop. (Via @mumbrella)

16 August 2010

My question got asked on Q&A the other night. Much obliged ABC! (I still think you’re communist hippies though.)

12 August 2010

Lame expectations in “The Twitter Election”

So we’ve now firmly established that this is NOT the ‘Twitter election’. Gotcha.

But what were we actually expecting?

That it would be a new Obama-era of campaigning, as political leaders engaged the masses through Twitter? Why the hell would they?

The Twitterati are an opinionated bunch, and as such, are likely to already have entrenched views. No point preaching to the chorus or the mob.

More importantly – as location tweeting is still only a US feature – you can’t tell which tweeters are from the all-important marginal electorates.

So you wouldn’t use it as either a targeted medium, or - with its fairly limited reach of 7.1% - as a broadcast medium either.

I just can’t see the advantage to the pollies engaging in more than a token Twitter effort. But here’s the real reason for the lack of Twitter zing…


Why ‘Twitter elections’ get their name

As I’ve written about before, so-called ‘Twitter elections’ haven’t been about using Twitter for polite debate.

‘Twitter elections’ have always been about mobilisation.

Twitter’s most dramatic effect is when its used on a tactical level. Organising flashmobs, communicating rumours and rapidly changing news, circumventing censors – this is where Twitter’s role is in sharp relief to the political process.

This was the case in Moldova, in Iran, and even in the US – where their system of political donations is built on large scale drives for public funding. And because of that distinct impact of a single channel, they were fairly described as ‘Twitter elections’. 

There’s little need for mobilisation in Australian politics. Our election is not between parties with distinctly polarised ideas. We lack the desperation that requires hitting the streets.

So, we need to chill the Twitter disappointment a bit, and revise our expectations to fit our context. Based on how well QandA trends on Twitter every Monday night, we’re seeing a young and growing audience passionately discussing political ideas every week.

If that’s not a pretty good effect on an election, I don’t know what is.

9 August 2010

Internet filter puts the common good first - a case for the filter

A considered argument for the Internet filter by the Christian Lobby. It’s good to see - we need both cases articulated clearly so they can be weighed on their merits. Right now, the debate is too ideological, too often shrill. That’s unhelpful.

For my part, I cannot support the filter for at least two reasons. The inclusion of Wikileaks on the initial blacklist is a demonstration of Government insouciance (at best) towards what makes the list.   

Secondly, even without a filter, the sad broadband speeds we currently enjoy in Aus are already a commercial impediment.  

Filtering is important, but it is the responsibility of the household, not the Government.

30 July 2010

The Web Means the End of Forgetting - NYTimes.com

trib:

Long, but interesting.

27 July 2010

Is there anyone in the country… who thinks last night’s debate wouldn’t have been made at least more interesting, if not more enlightening, with the presence of (Greens Leader) Bob Brown?

~ From Crikey’s Morning Newsletter. The debate was so boring it would’ve taken Gillard and Abbot cross dressing, swearing in Latin while firing spearguns at each other to actually make it interesting.

26 July 2010

Below is the crash and rattle of kettle drums that were leading this CFMEU march that just passed me on York Street. “Put the camera down and bloody join us” one guy yelled at me. I went and had a laksa instead.

20 July 2010

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

4 Plays

20 July 2010

What it's about...

Slacktivist
(Slang)
[slak-tuh-vist]:
one who's care and interest in society is in perfect equilibrium with his being a lazy bastard. ie. Me.

Armchair of El Diablo
(Bullshit term)
[ahrm-chair ov dev-uhl]:
The interwebs.

Tumblog
[tuhm-blah-blah]:
my corkboard to tack up events where the political, social and digital intersect...

... elections and riots; campaigns and chicanery; the righteous and the underhand...

...changing the world one lazy step at a time.

Shots